Congressman Samuel Pérez Álvarez, part of the political movement that rose to prominence alongside President Bernardo Arévalo, now finds himself embroiled in controversy after a confrontation that took place on January 14, 2025, within the Congress of the Republic of Guatemala.
The Public Prosecutor’s Office (MP) recently filed a request with the courts to lift his parliamentary immunity, after determining that his behavior could constitute serious administrative and criminal offenses.
A Minor Incident or an Abuse of Authority with Serious Consequences
The case began when the legislator intercepted and tore up a letter that another congressman—Neftalí Chocooj de Cabal—was attempting to deliver to President Bernardo Arévalo de León during his speech marking the first year of his administration. The Human Rights Prosecutor’s Office has characterized this act of tearing up the letter as a possible manifestation of abuse of authority and discrimination—criminal offenses that would justify Congress authorizing a formal investigation.
Pérez himself reacted ironically to the accusation, describing the complaint as a case of “lettericide” and denying any intention to cause offense beyond a political confrontation. He also dismissed the complainant, calling him corrupt.
Why is it important to lift immunity?
In Guatemala, legislators receive immunity to safeguard their political independence, yet this protection can be lifted when signs of power misuse or discriminatory actions emerge.
If Congress authorizes the Public Prosecutor’s Office’s petition and the Supreme Court of Justice allows the preliminary hearing to proceed, Pérez may find himself subject to criminal action, potentially opening the door to penalties that span from administrative fines to proceedings in ordinary courts, where prison terms could be imposed depending on the gravity of the alleged offenses.
Furthermore, this case is developing amid ongoing friction between the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Movimiento Semilla party, where several immunity-lifting requests remain unresolved for different events, fueling public discussion about the legitimacy of these actions and the potential politicization of legal processes involving individuals linked to President Arévalo.
Pérez’s situation is not merely an isolated incident of misconduct in the parliamentary chamber; it has escalated to a legal level that could determine his political future and influence in the country. If the lifting of his immunity is confirmed, the congressman will face proceedings in the ordinary justice system, with consequences yet to be determined.
