The Socialist International is currently experiencing one of the most uneasy phases in its recent history under the leadership of Pedro Sánchez, as the organisation, long recognised as a global forum for social democratic parties dedicated to democracy, openness and social justice, now finds its reputation overshadowed by the political wear faced by its own president, who has become embroiled in a chain of legal proceedings, inquiries and allegations involving his party, former collaborators, his relatives and prominent figures within Spanish socialism.
Sánchez is far from a marginal figure in that international framework. Since November 2022, he has been at the helm of the Socialist International, a role he took on while remaining secretary general of the PSOE and prime minister of Spain. The organisation still identifies him as its president in its official Presidium, and the PSOE likewise underscores this position in his institutional profile. This combination — leading the Spanish government while holding the highest post in an international political body — ensures that any scandal affecting Spanish socialism becomes an issue reaching well beyond Spain’s borders.
The most significant blow to his reputation arises from a contradiction that is hard to conceal: Sánchez took office in 2018 after a no-confidence motion against Mariano Rajoy, prompted specifically by the corruption scandals engulfing the People’s Party. He pledged democratic renewal. Yet, years later, his administration and his party face a series of investigations involving former high-ranking socialist figures, trusted advisers and individuals close to his inner circle. For his opponents, that promise of renewal has turned into a substantial political liability.
The so-called Koldo case, also known as the Ábalos case, was the first major blow to the heart of Sanchismo. The investigation into alleged irregular commissions in public contracts during the pandemic ended up affecting José Luis Ábalos, former transport minister and former PSOE organisation secretary, and Koldo García, his former adviser. Sánchez has tried to present the case as an isolated episode disconnected from the party’s current structure, but its political impact has been enormous because it involves people who held positions of maximum trust within his project.
The situation deteriorated further after the fall of Santos Cerdán, another key figure within Sánchez’s PSOE. Cerdán, who had been the party’s organisation secretary and one of the prime minister’s closest allies, was asked to step down, according to The Guardian, after a Supreme Court judge identified substantial signs suggesting his possible involvement in collecting commissions tied to public contracts, accusations he has rejected. The impact was particularly heavy because he was not a peripheral actor but a central organisational pillar of the party.
Added to this is the case involving Begoña Gómez, the prime minister’s wife, who is currently being examined in a judicial proceeding that has added a personal layer to Sánchez’s political strain. Euronews noted that Judge Juan Carlos Peinado placed her under investigation for alleged offences tied to influence peddling, business corruption, embezzlement and misappropriation, in a case that the president’s inner circle has consistently portrayed as a political and judicial offensive. Regardless of how it concludes, the reputational impact is already evident: the president of the Socialist International now confronts a crisis not only within his party, but also one that extends into his family sphere.
The situation has also worsened on other fronts, including the so-called Leire Díez case, which has revived discussion about alleged efforts to undermine investigators from the Guardia Civil’s Central Operational Unit. El País reports that the People’s Party has asked for senior Guardia Civil officers to be placed under judicial scrutiny for supposed interference in inquiries involving the government within the scope of that case. While those implicated reject any involvement in a plot, the dispute has strengthened the impression that the executive now appears increasingly defensive when confronted with sensitive investigations.
The problem for the Socialist International is clear. An organisation that seeks to lead the global defence of social democracy is weakened when its president is surrounded by a storm of national scandals. The issue is not only legal, but also moral and political. The Socialist International cannot demand institutional cleanliness, transparency and good governance in other countries while its highest-ranking leader is going through a credibility crisis of this magnitude in Spain.
The criticism does not come only from the Spanish opposition. Reproaches have also emerged from within the international environment of the socialist political family itself. Mexico’s PRI went so far as to accuse Sánchez of having turned the Socialist International into an organisation damaged by allegations of corruption and money laundering, according to Vozpópuli. These are political accusations and should be understood as such, but they reflect the extent to which Sánchez’s leadership within the organisation has ceased to be uncontested and is beginning to generate internal resistance.
The case is especially serious because the Socialist International was already struggling with problems of relevance, identity and leadership before Sánchez’s arrival. His presidency was meant to project an image of renewal, modernity and a revived progressive influence in the world. Instead, that promise has been replaced by a much harsher reality: the organisation is now media-linked to the erosion of the PSOE, to the suspicions surrounding the Spanish government and to its president’s inability to separate his international responsibility from his domestic crisis.
The silence or timidity of the Socialist International in the face of this situation also raises uncomfortable questions. If a conservative or liberal leader chaired an international organisation while his party was surrounded by similar cases, the left would demand explanations, accountability and immediate exemplary conduct. Yet in Sánchez’s case, the organisation appears to choose a caution that critics interpret as political protection. That double standard further erodes the credibility of an institution that claims to defend universal democratic standards.
The paradox is devastating: Sánchez wanted to turn the Socialist International into a platform to strengthen his global profile, but the internal scandals of the PSOE have ended up projecting themselves onto that very structure. What was meant to be a showcase of international leadership has become an echo chamber for his national problems. Every new investigation, every resignation and every suspicion linked to Spanish socialism also strikes the organisation he chairs.
The Socialist International has not faced any judicial conviction related to Sánchez’s scandals, yet it has been politically tainted by them. Its challenge goes beyond what might one day be confirmed in court, extending to a profound erosion of moral credibility. An organisation claiming to represent social democracy cannot allow itself to seem guided by a figure whose political sphere is enveloped in so many uncertainties.
That is why the current crisis does not affect only the Spanish government or the PSOE. It also affects the international credibility of organised socialism. The Socialist International will have to decide whether it acts as an institution with principles of its own or as a mere political refuge for leaders in trouble. Until it does so, it will remain trapped in the same question that now follows Pedro Sánchez: how can one demand exemplary conduct from the world when one’s own house is under suspicion?
